Clinton/Epstein Deep State Rape Enablers try to Silence Alex Jones

 

AGREED FACTS IN ALEX JONES CASE IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS CONFIRM FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF AND THEREFORE, WARRANT (1) VACATING THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (2) VACATING THE DAMAGES JUDGMENTS, AND (3) DISMISSING THE CASE AGAINST ALEX JONES

("SOF") = Statement of Agreed Fact

SOF#1: Scarlett Lewis said in her YouTube TED-X 2014 post description that she worked at the Llama Company owned by Alice Walton (family member of Wal-Mart founders and campaign finance contributor to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign) in Arkansas where Bill Clinton was Governor.

Hillary Clinton was on the Board of Directors at Wal-Mart and took campaign finance contributions for her 2016 Presidential campaign from Alice Walton.

Scarlett Lewis has a connection to the "Deep State" because she worked at the Llama Company, which was an investment bank owned by Alice Walton. Alice Walton is a member of the Walton family that started Wal-Mart.

Alice Walton has been one of the largest contributors to political committees to influence elections since 2004. She contributed $353,400 to Hillary Clinton's Victory Campaign Fund and to other funds for the Clintons and other Democrats. Alice Walton is also in the Arkansas Business Hall of Fame and has actively participated in many government forums for commerce in Arkansas where Bill Clinton was Governor.

SCARLETT LEWIS PERJURED HERSELF WHEN SHE SAID IN OPEN COURT ON THE STAND TO ALEX JONES THAT SHE HAD NO CONNECTIONS TO THE CLINTONS/DEEP STATE.

Here is Scarlett Lewis committing perjury on the stand claiming that she has no connections to the Deep State. Perjury statements are at 0:20-0:25, and at 1:57-2:01.

This is the same discrediting tactics the Clintons/Deep State used to try and discredit Brett Kavanaugh with the Christine Blasey Ford theatrics during Judge Kavanaugh's U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

Scarlett Lewis' Perjury of Material Facts warrants dismissal of the case against Alex Jones.

SOF#2: Scarlett Lewis confirmed at a TED-X talk posted on YouTube in May of 2014 (over a year after her son's death) that she had no emotional distress when her son died and that continues "to this day".

This means that Scarlett Lewis and Mr. Heslin did not suffer from any damages caused by defamation or intentional inflection of emotional distress arising from Alex Jones' conduct. No damages = no claims. No claims = no case. No case = Dismissal for failure to state a claim for relief.

Here is Scarlett Lewis giving a TED-X Lecture bragging about the outpouring of love and compassion that she had from the Sandy Hook Massacre which led to the death of her son "that continues to this day". The "continuum" runs over the timeline where Alex Jones said that the Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax. She describes the moment of her son's death as "a great moment" and that there was no break in the continuum of the outpouring of love and compassion.

WATCH WHAT SHE SAYS BETWEEN 3:55-4:35. She confirms that there was no emotional distress inflicted on her between the time the Sandy Hook Massacre took place in December 2012 up to the date of this video, which is in May of 2014. This is long after Alex Jones had broadcasted his belief that the Sandy Hook Massacre was a hoax.

Does she look damaged from emotional distress to you?

SOF#3: Judge Gamble stated in open court that she knows Alex Jones believes everything he says is true.

This means that the elements of Defamation and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress have not been met. Defamation and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress require intent.

Because Alex Jones believes everything that he says is true, regardless of whether it is true or not, it is not Defamation. Also, because Alex Jones believes everything that he says is true, then the element of "Intent" is also missing for "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress" claims because emotional distress claims, like defamation claims, require intent.

Alex Jones is covered under the First Amendment to speak his truth because he believes that what he says is true. His statements do not need to be true. He simply has to believe that they are true. If he believes that what he is saying is true, then there is no intent which means there is no "Defamation" (which requires Intent) or "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress" (which also requires Intent). No intent = no claims. No claims = no case. No case = Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim for Relief.

SOF#4: Plaintiff's counsel said he had to explain who Alex Jones is and what InfoWars.com is because the jury has never heard of Alex Jones and InfoWars.com.

Damage claims require proximity. Plaintiff's counsel agrees that Alex Jones and InfoWars.com did not have proximity to the Defendants to cause any damage to the Defendants evidenced by the fact that Plaintiff's counsel made the assertion that a lack of knowledge about Alex Jones and InfoWars.com required Plaintiff's counsel to explain Alex Jones and InfoWars.com to the Jury.

This sort of explanation would not be required for a pervasive media outlet such as FoxNews, CNN, or MSNBC. Therefore, Plaintiff's counsel confirmed that Alex Jones and InfoWars.com do not have any proximity because they do not broadcast in every home with a television throughout the country.

No proximity = no damages. No damages = no claims. No claims = no case.

SOF#5: Alex Jones filed for Bankruptcy.

This means that Judge Gamble's court proceedings are a violation of the Bankruptcy Court's Stay Order which prohibits pursuit of claims against the Debtor through venues outside of the Bankruptcy Court. Violation of the Bankruptcy Court Stay Order warrants dismissal of the judgments.

SOF#6: Default Judgments are discharged in Bankruptcy Court because (1) Bankruptcy Court favors the Debtor, (2) the Judgments were not evaluated on the merits, and (3) agreed facts from Judge Gamble confirm that Alex Jones did not commit fraud because Alex Jones had no intent.

In order for judgments to pass through a Bankruptcy case without discharge, the judgments must be (1) based on merit and not just default, and (2) there is fraud involved on the part of the debtor.

All default judgments not evaluated on the merits are dismissed through Bankruptcy Court. In addition, Judge Gamble confirmed that Alex Jones was operating in good faith because she said that she knows that Alex Jones believes that everything he says is true. This means the elements of fraud have not been met because fraud requires intent. Judge Gamble confirmed there is no intent from Alex Jones. No intent = no fraud. No fraud means the Judgments warrant discharge by the Bankruptcy Court.

SOF#7: The Discovery Requests from Plaintiff to Alex Jones that were the subject matter for the Default Judgment focused exclusively on Alex Jones' financial records production. There was no disclosure of the financial records showing loss of revenues from the Claimants.

The Discovery Requests for Alex Jones' financial records were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and were unlikely to lead to the discoverability of admissible evidence to support or refute any claims of defamation or intentional infliction of emotional distress at Trial because Alex Jones financial records do not show any damages to Claimants with loss of reputation or emotional distress measured by Claimants' loss of revenues.

The Discovery Requests from Plaintiff were focused on Alex Jones' financial records. However, defamation claims and emotional distress claims require a showing of damages inflicted on the claimants by the CLAIMANTS producing THEIR financial records to show loss of revenues as the measurement of actual damages.

Alex Jones' financial records disclosures which were the subject matter of the default judgment do not lead to the discoverability of admissible evidence to support or refute any claim of defamation or intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Claimants' financial records and agreed facts confirm that the Claimants' financial status and emotional support improved from the Sandy Hook massacre. Therefore, with no measurable damages evidenced by loss of revenues shown from the Claimants, no damages = no claims. No claims = no case.

SOF#8: Alex Jones did not commit any perjury with respect to discovery because Plaintiffs' counsel confirmed that all of Alex Jones's text messages were disclosed to the Plaintiffs.

Again, perjury requires intent. Scarlett Lewis intentionally lied about her connection to the Clintons/the Deep State knowing that she had a connection to the Clintons/the Deep State, which is a Material Fact, and Scarlett Lewis failed to disclose CLAIMANTS' financial records establishing loss of revenues arising from Alex Jones' conduct.

However, Alex Jones disclosed all of his text messages to the Plaintiffs' counsel even though the discovery requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, irrelevant, and unlikely to lead to the discoverability to support or refute a claim at Trial.

In addition, there was no intentional concealment of material facts from Alex Jones because Plaintiffs' Discovery Requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and unlikely to lead to the discoverability of admissible evidence to support or refute a claim at Trial.

Alex Jones said he has several phones and had tried to review the text messages to find what Plaintiffs' counsel wanted but had missed it. This does not rise to the level of intent which is an element of perjury when the Plaintiffs' discovery requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and unlikely to lead to the discoverability of admissible evidence to support or refute a claim at trial.

Plaintiffs' discovery requests were an abuse of the discovery process and should not be rewarded by this Court with a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for the Plaintiffs' discovery abuses.

On the contrary, Plaintiffs' concealment of material discovery and facts with discovery abuses inflicted on Alex Jones warrants dismissal.

Agreed Facts Confirm:

ALEX JONES IS COVERED UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

ALEX JONES DID NOT COMMIT FRAUD.

ALEX JONES DID NOT COMMIT DEFAMATION.

ALEX JONES DID NOT INFLICT ANY EMOTIONAL DISTRESS.

SCARLETT LEWIS IS CONNECTED TO THE CLINTONS/DEEP STATE.

ALEX JONES IS IN BANKRUPTCY COURT AND THESE PROCEEDINGS ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT STAY ORDER.

ALEX JONES WAS DENIED HIS CIVIL RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY.

ALEX JONES WAS DENIED HIS CIVIL RIGHTS FOR DUE PROCESS.

ALEX JONES WAS DENIED HIS CIVIL RIGHTS TO GET A FAIR TRIAL.

ALEX JONES WAS DENIED HIS CIVIL RIGHTS TO SPEAK.

ALEX JONES WAS DENIED HIS RIGHTS THROUGH THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO BE FREE FROM PERSECUTION WHILE THE BANKRUPTCY CASE IS PENDING.

*******************************************************

STATEMENT OF AGREED FACTS ("SOF")

SOF#1: Scarlett Lewis said in her YouTube TED-X 2014 post description that she worked at the Llama Company in Arkansas.

SOF#2: Scarlett Lewis confirmed at a TED-X talk posted on YouTube in May of 2014 (over a year after her son's death) that she had no emotional distress between the time her son died "to this day".

SOF#3: Judge Gamble stated in open court that she knows Alex Jones believes everything he says is true.

SOF#4: Plaintiff's counsel said he had to explain who Alex Jones is and what InfoWars.com is because the jury has never heard of Alex Jones and InfoWars.com.

SOF#5: Judge Gamble confirmed that she knew Alex Jones had filed for Bankruptcy.

SOF#6: Default Judgments are discharged in Bankruptcy Court because (1) Bankruptcy Court favors the Debtor, (2) the Judgments were not evaluated on the merits, and (3) agreed facts from Judge Gamble confirm that Alex Jones did not commit fraud because Alex Jones had no intent.

SOF#7: The Discovery Requests from Plaintiff to Alex Jones that were the subject matter for the Default Judgment focused exclusively on Alex Jones' financial records production. There was no disclosure of the financial records showing loss of revenues from the Claimants.

SOF#8: Alex Jones did not commit any perjury with respect to discovery because Plaintiffs' counsel confirmed that all of Alex Jones's text messages were disclosed to the Plaintiffs.